VII) Refuting Prophet Muhammad: A Terrorist

Assalamualaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barkatahu (May Peace, Blessings & Mercy of Allah Be Upon You)

Article by Brother Asim ul Haq

The Article is in reply to series of allegations made by author in his book which can be accessed here: What Prophet Mohammed Did His Whole Life?

Titles of these allegations against Prophet are mentioned below, Inshallah each allegation would be answered in individual article by titles mentioned below

1) Muhammad married and had sex with 09 year old girl named Ayesha.
2) Refuting Muhammad kept his daughter–in-law without marriage.
3) Refuting Muhammad encouraged suicide attacks
4) Refutation of Muhammad approved prostitution
5) Refuting Muhammad recommended wife beating and he also beat his favourite wife Ayesha
6) Muhammad killed unconditionally surrendered prisoners of war
7) Muhammad: A Terrorist
8) Muhammad captured a woman and raped her. He encouraged the rape of women in front of their husbands.
9) Muhammad said no to friendship with Christians and Jews.
10) Muhammad proscribed death for the Muslim who converts to another religion.
11) Muhammad told sick persons to heal themselves by drinking camel urine.
12) Muhammad told beat children who do not pray.
13) Muhammad had 11 wives at one time.
14) Muhammad permitted Muslims to steal from non muslims.
15) Muhammad recommended hate for the people of all religion.
16) Muhammad extorted money from other religions.
17) Muhammad advocated force conversions in to Islam..
18) Muhammad’s atrocity against the Qurayza Jews.
19) Muhammad told women are worth less than a man.
20) The Death of ‘Asma’ Bint Marwan.
21) Muhammad told Muslims to tell lie.
22) Muhammad was a looter demanded 20{ecb01613692258d40e800a99e4d746e5d13d05ec98d2e9f5c1cfefb6e9fee158} from loot.
23) Muhammad ordered muslims not to ask question


7. Muhammad: A Terrorist (Bukhari 4:52.220)


1st thing Abul Kasem copied pasted article from Ali Sina’s article with the same name and text one can see here

Let us see what copy/paster quoted



Apart from quoting hadeeth (reference given in heading) Ali Sina / Abul Kasem said

The dictionary definition of terrorism is “the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear.” Sadly, we are living in an age that we do not need to consult a dictionary to learn the meaning of terrorism. Even our children know about it and are affected by it.



Yes we all know how US army (terrorist army) attacked in Afghanistan and Iraq, How Israeli Army (terrorist army) attacked in Palestine, How Muslims are suffering in Jail of Abu Ghuraib, guantanamo etc

A Touching Reply
Israeli child: “My Father says, You & Your People are terrorists”
Palestinian child: “I have never heard my Father’s voice, because.. He was killed by Your People”

and see here Massacres of only Israelis

The following list of massacres is by no means exclusive, but they reflect the nature of the Zionist occupation of Palestine and Lebanon and show that massacres and expulsions were not aberrations that happen in any war, but organized atrocities with only one aim, that is to have a Zionist state which is ‘goyim rein’.


The King David Massacre
The Massacre at Baldat al-Shaikh
The Semiramis Hotel Massacre
The Massacre at Dair Yasin
Salha Massacre
The Massacre at Qibya
Khan Yunis Massacre
The Massacre in Gaza City
Aitharoun Massacre
Kawnin Massacre
Hanin Massacre
Bint Jbeil Massacre
Abbasieh Massacre
Adloun Massacre
Saida Massacre
Fakhani Massacre
Beirut Massacre
Jibsheet Massacre
Sohmor Massacre
Seer Al Garbiah
Maaraka Massacres
Zrariah Massacre
Homeen Al-Tahta Massacre
Jibaa Massacre
Yohmor Massacre
Tiri massacre
Al-Naher Al-Bared Massacre
Ain Al-Hillwee Massacre
Siddiqine Massacre
Aramta Massacre
Deir Al-Zahrani Massacre
Nabatiyeh (school bus) Massacre
Mnsuriah Massacre
The Sohmor Second Massacre
Nabatyaih Massacre
Qana Massacre
Trqumia Massacr
Janta Massacre
24 Of June 1999 Massacres
Western Bekaa villages Massacre

for detailes see:

and there are 100s of other Massacers



He said
Islamic terrorism, however, did not start in 9/11 of 2001, nor did it start with the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979. Islamic terrorism has its origin in the sayings and examples set by Muhammad.


Author need to get a life, Regarding 9/11 Non Muslims themselves refuted the Idea that it was done by Muslims.

Loose Change is a series of films released between 2005 and 2009 which argue that the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned and conducted by elements within the United States government, and base the claims on perceived anomalies in the historical record of the attacks. The films were written and directed by Dylan Avery, and produced by Korey Rowe, Jason Bermas and Matthew Brown.
The original 2005 film was edited and re-released as Loose Change: 2nd Edition (2006), and then subsequently edited a third time for the 2nd Edition Recut (2007), each time to tighten the focus on certain key areas and to correct some inaccurate claims and remove copyrighted material. Loose Change: Final Cut, deemed “the third and final release of this documentary series”[1] was released on DVD and Web-streaming format on November 11, 2007

Another version of the film, Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup, released on September 22, 2009, is narrated by Daniel Sunjata and distributed by Microcinema International

Coverage for the film increased in 2006 with the recut release having airings on U.S. and European television stations and over 4 million views online in four months. leading Vanity Fair to say it could be the first internet blockbuster. Loose Change puts the 9/11 attacks within a context of a false flag operation and goes on to question the plausibility of the Pentagon attack, World Trade Center collapse and United 93 phone calls and crash. The film’s main claims have been refuted by journalists, independent and 9/11 Truth researchers. and prominent members of the scientific and engineering community.

also see:

Taliban Denied this attack



What more do you want?? still confused?? if yes then Allah says

[002:018] They are deaf, dumb, and blind, so they return not (to the Right Path).



He said
In the last ten years of his life, after Muhammad migrated to Medina , he launched no less than 78 raids called qazwa (raid, ambush, sudden attack). Some of these qazwas involved the assassination of one opponent by one or a group of volunteers, and others were carried out by hundreds or thousands of warriors. Nonetheless a common characteristic of all Muhammad’s incursions was that they were done without notice. The enemy was caught off guard without being given the chance to prepare himself or be armed. As such all Muhammad’s victims were civilians.


Above is a mere claim of abu al kasem he has not provided any kind of reference so i am leaving this part Just in short


The Prophet sallallâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam had to fight in nine battles, Badr, ‘Uhud, al-Khandaqh, Quraidhah, al-Mustaliqh, Khaybar, al-Fath’ (Conquering of Makkah), ‘Hunayn and Tâ’if. It was said that the Prophet sallallâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam also fought against Banî an-Nadhîr (a Jewish tribe) and at al-Ghabah and Wadi al-Qura, which was a suburb of Khaybar. (The Prophet’s Battles, Armies and Expeditions By Imâm ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah rahimahullâh “Zâd al-Ma’âd fî Hadyi Khayri-l ‘Ibâd”)



He quoted
The historian Abul Husain Muslim Nisapuri writes:
Ibn ‘Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi’ inquiring from him whether it was necessary to extend (to the disbelievers) an invitation to accept (Islam) before meeting them in fight. He wrote (in reply) to me that it was necessary in the early days of Islam. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu Mustaliq while they were unaware and their cattle were having a drink at the water. He killed those who fought and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captured Juwairiya bint al-Harith. Nafi’ said that this tradition was related to him by Abdullah b. Umar who (himself) was among the raiding troops. Muslim 19: 4292


Abul Husayn Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj Qushayri al-Nishapuri was not a Historian but a Muhaddith 2ndly Brother Abd al-Muhsin al Hindy already replied here

The Banu Mustaliq, a branch of Banu Khuza’a occupied the territory of Qadid on the Red Sea shore between Jeddah and Rabigh. In 527 C.E. news was brought to Madina that the Banu Mustaliq in alliance with some other tribes were gathering to make a raid on Madina. The policy of the Holy Prophet was that the Muslims should not lose the initiative in such cases, and should take such tribes by surprise. Another aspect of the policy was that action against individual tribes should be taken before they could effect an alliance.

News reached the Prophet [pbuh] on Sha’ban 2nd. to the effect that the chief of Bani Al-Mustaliq, Al-Harith bin Dirar had mobilised his men, along with some Arabs, to attack Madinah. Buraidah bin Al-Haseeb Al-Aslami was immediately despatched to verify the reports. He had some words with Abi Dirar, who confirmed his intention of war. He later sent a reconnoiterer to explore the positions of the Muslims but he was captured and killed. The Prophet [pbuh] summoned his men and ordered them to prepare for war. Before leaving, Zaid bin Haritha was mandated to see to the affairs of Madinah and dispose them. On hearing the advent of the Muslims, the disbelievers got frightened and the Arabs going with them defected and ran away to their lives. Abu Bakr was entrusted with the banner of the Emigrants, and that of the Helpers went to Sa’d bin ‘Ubada. The two armies were stationed at a well called Muraisi. Arrow shooting went on for an hour, and then the Muslims rushed and engaged with the enemy in a battle that ended in full victory for the Muslims. Some men were killed, women and children of the disbelievers taken as captives, and a lot of booty fell to the lot of the Muslims. Only one Muslim was killed by mistake by a Helper. Amongst the captives was Juwairiyah, daughter of Al-Harith, chief of the disbelievers. The Prophet [pbuh] married her and, in compensation, the Muslims had to manumit a hundred others of the enemy prisoners who embraced Islam, and were then called the Prophet’s in-laws. [Za’d Al-Ma’ad 2/112,113; Ibn Hisham 2/289,290,294,295]

This was also narrated by Aasim bin Amr bin Qutada and collected by Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani in Fathul Bari (496/7).

So obviously the Prophet is not going to wait around and let them attack first. Obviously the Prophet is going to attack them by surprise. It was a military strategy. What kind of commander would let the enemy know in advance that he is going to attack them? That would only prepare them for the fight and result in heavier casualties on the other side. (end quote from Islamic-Life)

Brother Bazzam Zawadi Compiled beautiful article see here:

above article is a must see to clear the misconception.

b) and see Brother Bassam Zawadi’s Reply to the article of Ali Sina “Juwairiyah”:



Abu Al Kasem said

Muhammad used the same element of surprise in virtually all his raids. Bukhari writes:
Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) offered the Fajr prayer when it was still dark, then he rode and said, ‘Allah Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. When we approach near to a nation, the most unfortunate is the morning of those who have been warned.” The people came out into the streets saying, “Muhammad and his army.” Allah’s Apostle vanquished them by force and their warriors were killed; the children and women were taken as captives. Safiya was taken by Dihya Al-Kalbi and later she belonged to Allah’s Apostle go who married her and her Mahr was her manumission. Bukhari 2.14.068 Here we read that Muhammad said: ―the most unfortunate is the morning of those who have been warned.‖ This should not be interpreted as announcing his plans for war. Actually not even his men knew which town they are going to attack until they reached at the gates of that town. He sent spies to the cities that he wanted to attack and ambushed them when they were least prepared. This ―warning‖ should be interpreted with the understanding of the Muslim mind. As far as Muslims are concerned we are all warned. They have called us to convert or prepare to die. This is the warning. There will be no other warning. Now that they have issued the warning, we are all fair game. All the non-Muslims are legitimate targets of Islamic terrorism. Muslim warriors today, do what their prophet did and follow his examples. The pattern and the modus operandi, is already set. All Muslims’ wars and conquests have been through raid. This has been always the case and the secret of their success.


Again a mere claim by abu al kasem see the context

Battle Of Khyber
After having been driven away from Madina, the Jews settled at Khyber. The Jews were a cunning and crafty people, and they involved themselves in intrigues against the Muslims.

The pact of Hudaibiya brought truce with the Quraish for a period of ten years. This meant that the Quraish could no longer openly aid the Jews against the Muslims. In spite of this situation, there was no diminution in the hostility of the Jews against the Muslims, and they began to work for the formation of an another coalition against the Muslims.

To forestall the evil designs of the Jews, the Holy Prophet marched to Khyber in 629 A.D. with a force of 1,400 Muslims. The Jews shut themselves in their forts. Some of these forts were very formidable with frowning walls built of the living rock.

The Jews had ample provisions, and there was no shortage of arms with them. They were offered to accept Islam, but they spurned the offer. Thereupon the Holy Prophet ordered an offensive against the Jews.

On the first day the Muslims led the attack against the Jews under the command of Abu Bakr. The Jews remained locked up in their forts and there was no confrontation.

The following day, Umar commanded the Muslim forces. The Jews remained shut up in their forts and there was no fight.

On the third day, Ali commanded the Muslim forces. Surprisingly, the Jews came out of their forts that day and fought in the open. In a hand to hand fight the Jews were overpowered and they capitulated.

According to the terms of the settlement, the Jews agreed to submit to the suzerainty of the Muslims, and to pay them a land tax equivalent to one half of the land produce.

The battle of Khyber had far reaching consequences. It established the paramountcy of Islam in the Arabian peninsula. The Jews now became the subjects of the Muslim State. As the Quraish thereby lost the support of the Jews, the battle of Khyber paved the way for the conquest of Mecca.

At Khyber, Zainab bint Harith a Jewish lady invited the Holy Prophet and his companions to a feast. Abu Bakr sat by the side of the Holy Prophet, and next to Abu Bakr sat Umar.

The Holy Prophet took a morsel of meat and after chewing it threw it away saying, “The meat is poisoned.” Abu Bakr and Umar had so far held their hands. Bishr bin Bra who sat next to the Holy Prophet on the other side ate a good deal of meat, and after a few moments he was dead.

The feast ended in confusion, Zainab was put to explanation, and she admitted her guilt. She pleaded that she had poisoned the meat thinking that if Muhammad (peace be on him) was a prophet he would find that it was poisoned, and if he was not a prophet, the world would get rid of him.

Accounts of subsequent proceedings differ. According to one account Zainab became a Muslim and was forgiven.


In short Jews began to instigate the Arab tribes between Khyber and Medina to attack the Muslims,Jews were so hostile to the Muslims, Muslims had to take action.



Abul Kasem said
In one hadith Muhammad boasted, ―I have been made victorious through terror. Bukhari 4:52.220


Brother Ansar Al-‘Adl replied in his article “Commonly Misquoted Verses and Narrations” under “Misquoted narration #5”

The full narration reads as follows:
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with ru’b (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them). (Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220)

By using the word ‘Terror’ for ru’b, the Islam-hater intends to convey the following definition of terror:

Violence committed or threatened by a group to intimidate or coerce a population, as for military or political purposes. (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition)

However, the word ru’b does not have that meaning at all. It refers to fright and anxiety. In fact, we can derive a better understanding of ru’b by examing other ahadith:

The Prophet (peace be upon him) saod: “I was given victory through Ru’b: the enemy becomes filled with Ru’b even though they are the distance of a month’s journey away from me.” (Ahmad #20337)

The meaning is thus obvious that when the enemies’ attempts to detroy the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) failed, they began to fear him as he grew in strength in Arabia and gained more followers. They feared and hated the religion he brought which preached equality and morality and would remove them from their position of corrupt tyrants who enslaved the poor and the non-arabs. It was fear of the mysterious power which granted Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his followers such rapid success. This fear was not the fear that resulted from past combat, as many Islam-haters would have us believe, rather it was a type of fear which prevented further combat. As Jalal Abualrub notes:

Ru’b ‘, means, ‘Fear’: Here is a list of some of the Islamic resources explaining, ‘Ru’b’, as, ‘Fear’, and, ‘Awe’: Fat’h al-Bari bi Shar’h Sahih al-Bukhari ; Tu’hfat al-A’hwadhi bi Shar’h Jami’ at-Tirmidhi ; and, Shar’h Sunan an-Nasaii . These books were written by Muslim Scholars explaining Hadeeths contained in, Sahih al-Bukhari , and the Sunan collections of Imams at-Tirmidhi and an-Nasaii, respectively…. …Al-Waqidi said in his, Maghazi , that Juwairiyah Bint al-Harith said, ” We were at the Muraisii’ area when the Messenger of Allah marched forth towards us. I heard my father say, ‘There has come to us a gathering that we cannot resist.’ I saw men and horses in such numbers that I cannot describe. After I became Muslim and the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, married me I looked at the Muslims and found their numbers to be less than what I had thought. I knew that this was Ru’b that Allah, the Exalted, throws in the hearts of the polytheists.’ ” There are many similar examples in which the enemies of Islam, who, just like the Muraisii’ people, had gathered armies to attack Madinah and the Prophet, scattered throughout the desert in fear when they heard that the Prophet had gathered an army to resist their treacherous attacks. Many lives were saved through Allah throwing fear in the hearts of the enemies of Muhammad, peace be upon them, because his enemies feared him, fled and did not meet him in battle. Thus, ‘fear’, in the Hadeeth…saved Muslims and many of their enemies the hardship of battle and warfare. (Abualrub, The Prophet of Mercy, emphasis added)

hence, the fear that the disbelievers had of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) can justly be compared to the fear a thief or murderer would have of a police officer. In fact, a Police officer would desire that criminals fear the law in order to maintain a safe and secure society. Some crtitics also claim that this narration proves that the motivation of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was money due to the phrase, “the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and placed in my hand”. Of course they omit the phrase before that – “While I was asleep”. Jalal Abualrub comments on this deceptive tactic as follows:

By doing so, it would appear that the Prophet, peace be upon him, was seeking or wishing to acquire other people’s wealth for himself. Contrary to this false illusion, this was a vision that the Prophet saw which contained glad tidings for the generations of Muslims to come. This is why in the same Hadeeth, Abu Hurairah added, as al-Bukhari and Muslim reported from him, ” Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them). (Abualrub, The Prophet of Mercy)

There are thousands of narrations which confirm that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) lived a simple life in poverty despite the power and strength he acquired as a leader. Here are a few of such narrations:

Narrated ‘Aisha: The family of Muhammad had never eaten their fill of wheat bread for three successive days since they had migrated to Medina till the death of the Prophet. (Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 76, Number 461)

Narrated ‘Aisha: The family of Muhammad did not eat two meals on one day, but one of the two was of dates. (Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 76, Number 462)

Narrated ‘Aisha: The bed mattress of the Prophet was made of a leather case stuffed with palm fibres. (Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 76, Number 463)

Narrated Qatada: We used to go to Anas bin Malik and see his baker standing (preparing the bread). Anas said, “Eat. I have not known that the Prophet ever saw a thin well-baked loaf of bread till he died, and he never saw a roasted sheep with his eyes.” (Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 76, Number 464)

Narrated ‘Aisha: A complete month would pass by during which we would not make a fire (for cooking), and our food used to be only dates and water unless we were given a present of some meat. (Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 76, Number 465)

In truth, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) never desired anything of the worldly pleasures. His mission was solely to please his Lord and spread the true message across the land, calling people to morality, justice and peace achieved through submission to God.


Brother Bassam Zawadi replied to Ali Sina
What is this lie that Ali Sina is spreading? He said that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) attacked those who did not even do harm to him. What does the Quran say about this? It says..

Surah 60:8
“God does not forbid you from showing kindness and dealing justly with those who have not fought you about religion and have not driven you out of your homes. God loves just dealers.

If you believe that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the author of the Quran and Muhammad (peace be upon him) wanted to go around killing everyone then why didn’t Muhammad teach that in the Quran? Show one shred of evidence where Muhammad (peace be upon him) deliberately attacked people that did no wrong to him or weren’t planning to do anything wrong to him.




He quoted
About four years after Hijra, an ambulant vendor came to Medina reporting that the tribes of Anmar and Tha’laba, (sun clans of Ghatfan) have gathered in Dhatal Riqa’. Upon hearing this news Muhammad left his loyal companion Utham in charge of the city and with a group of four hundred men (or seven hundred) warriors immediately headed to the place of the gathering of these Arab tribes. He found no one there but a few women, between them there was a beautiful girl. They captured the women. The men of the tribe took refuge in the mountains. (Ibn Sa’d Tabaqat V. 2 P. 59)


Firstly Tabqat al kubra, Tareekh at Tabri etc are not good sources to know about Islam, They are not the book of Ahadeeth, secondly this is what Mentioned in Tabqaat al Kubra with out any chain of narrators

It says
فأخبر أصحاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله أن أنمارا وثعلبة قد جمعوا لهم الجموع ، فبلغ ذلك رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله فخرج ليلة السبت لعشر خلون من المحرم في أربعمائة ، وقيل : في سبعمائة ، فمضى حتى أتى محالهم بذات الرقاع وهي جبل فلم يجد إلا نسوة فأخذهن وفيهن جارية وضيئة ، وهربت الاعراب إلى رؤس الجبال ، وخاف المسلمون أن يغيروا عليهم ، فصلى بهم النبي صلى الله عليه وآله صلاة الخوف ، وكان أول ما صلاها
“So the Companions of the Prophet of Allah Peace be upon him and his family mentioned that the tribes of Anmar and Thalaba have gathered troops. This came to the Prophet of Allah Peace be upon him and his family so he went on the night of saturday after 10 days of Muharram with 400 men and it was said 700. So he moved until he reached their area in Dhat Arriqaa and it is a mountain. So he did not find except women and he took them and amongst them a beautiful young woman. The bedouins ran to the tops of the mountains and then the Muslims feared that now they(Bedouins) will raid them, therefore the Prophet Peace be upon him and his family lead them in the prayer of fear and it was the first time he prayed This Salah.”(end)

as we can see, the translation offered by Ali Sina is totally a deception. the infidels were the ones causing terrorism by picking a fight with the muslims as they gathered troops, Ali Sina hided the words “Tribes of Anmar and Thalaba have gathered troops” so that he can make his article beautiful aganst Muslims but he totally failed Alhumdulillah, after that Prophet peace be upon him answered the call of Sahaba to go meet them. Thus this was a ghazwa, a war confrontation. The enemy, either left their women due to fear or tried to have the upper hand against the Muslims by going in the mountains which would explain why the Muslims gained some fear for in the principles of war, having the literal upperground accounts for greater tactical advantage.

the only thing it states is that they found the women and they were taken, among them a beautiful young women. It does not reveal anything outside of that. The fiqh gained from this was the sunnah of the fear prayer. That is, of course, if the narration itself is acceptable.

It is mentioned in Al Raheeq Al Makhtoom under the heading The Expedition called Dhat-ur-Riqa’ (in the year 7 A.H.)

Having subdued two powerful sides of the Confederates coalition, the Prophet [pbuh] started preparations to discipline the third party, i.e. the desert bedouins, who took Najd for habitation, and continued in their usual practices of looting and plundering. Unlike the Jews of Khaibar and people of Makkah, they had a liking for living in the wilderness dispersed in scattered spots, hence the difficulty of bringing them under control, and the futility of carrying out deterrent campaigns against them. However, the Prophet [pbuh] was determined to put an end to this unacceptable situation and called the Muslims around him to get ready to launch a decisive campaign against those harassing rebels. Meanwhile it was reported to him that Bani Muharib and Banu Tha’lbah of the Ghatfan tribe were gathering army in order to encounter the Muslims. The Prophet [pbuh] proceeded towards Najd at the head of 400 or 700 men, after he had mandated Abu Dhar – in another version, ‘Uthman bin ‘Affan – to dispose the affairs of Madinah during his absence. The Muslim fighters penetrated deep into their land until they reached a spot called Nakhlah where they came across some bedouins of Ghatfan, but no fighting took place because the latter had agreed to go into reconciliation with the Muslims. The Prophet [pbuh] led his followers that day in a prayer of fear.

Al-Bukhari, on the authority of Abu Musa Al-Ash’ari, narrated that they set out on an expedition with the Messenger of Allâh [pbuh]. “We were six in number and had (with us) only one camel which we rode turn by turn. Our feet were injured. My feet were so badly injured that my nails came off. We, therefore, bandaged our feet with rags, so this expedition was called Dhat-ur-Riqa’ (i.e. the expedition of rags.)” [Sahih Al-Bukhari 2/592; Sahih Muslim 2/118]

Jabir narrated: In the course of Dhat-ur-Riqa’ expedition, we came to a leafy tree where the Prophet [pbuh] sat shading himself off the burning sun. The others dispersed here and there seeking shelter from heat. The Prophet [pbuh] had a short nap after he had hung his sword on the tree. A polytheist, meanwhile came, seized the sword and unsheathed it.

The Prophet [pbuh] woke up to find his sword drawn in the man’s hand. The bedouin here asked the Prophet (unarmed then): “Who would hold me back from killing you now?” The Prophet [pbuh] then answered: “It is Allâh.” In another version, it was reported that the Prophet [pbuh] took the sword when it had fallen down and the man said: “You (the Prophet) are the best one to hold a sword.” The Prophet [pbuh] asked the man if he would testify to the Oneness of Allâh and the Messengership of Muhammad. The Arabian answered that he would never engage in a fight against him, nor would he ally people fighting the Muslims. The Prophet [pbuh] set the man free and let him go to his people to say to them that he had seen the best one among all people. [Mukhtasar Seerat Ar-Rasool p.264; Fath Al-Bari 7/416](end quote)

So from above we can see what Ali Sina quoted and what actually happened, The beduin were looting and plundering abd they gathered troops against Muslims, And they had a liking for living in the wilderness dispersed in scattered spots and then the Prophet [pbuh] was determined to put an end to this unacceptable situation and called the Muslims around him to get ready to launch a decisive campaign against those harassing rebels also in Al Raheeq Al Makhtoom the hadeeth states that A polytheist who tried to Kill Prophet peace be upon him

The person said after he failed to kill Prophet peace be upon him.
“You (the Prophet) are the best one to hold a sword.”
and Prophet peace be upon him said

The Prophet [pbuh] set the man free and let him go to his people to say to them that he had seen the best one among all people.

See how Ali Sina(and copy paster abul kasem) decieved?

also see this beautiful article:



Ali Sina / Abul Kasem quoted
Two months after the raid of Dhatal Riqa’ Muhammad received the news that a large group of Ghatfan has gathered in the oasis of Dumatal Jandal, between Hijaz and al-Sham to barter goods. This place was five nights journey from Medina . Muhammad immediately gathered one thousand of his followers. They rode during the night and hid during the day. Muhammad also took the informer who was from the tribe of Bani udhrah as the guide. He reached this group at night time and the footprints of their herds of goats and camels could were still on the ground. The Muslims raided the herds of the animals, some of the shepherds were killed and some escaped. Muslims collected a large spoil. When the news reached the people of Domat, they scattered and the Prophet found no one in their place. He stayed a few days and sent various groups to the neighborhood to investigate but they returned having found no one, except one man whom they took as captive. Muhammad asked him about the tribe, the man said when the people heard about the raid they escaped. The Prophet then called upon him to accept Islam, which he did and then the Muslims returned to Medina . (Ibn Sa’d Tabaqat V. 2 P. 60)
Muslim historian claim that Muhammad the Qatfan were planning to attack Muslims. This is typical Islamic mindset, that always blames their victims. As the their own tale makes it clear, these people were a bunch of nomads and herdsmen and not warriors. Today Muslims use the same excuses and blame their victims to justify their crimes against humanity. As an Arab proverb says: Darabani, wa baka; Sabaqani, wa’shtaka ― He struck me, and started crying; then he went ahead of me and charged me with beating him!‖ This has been Muhammad’s and his followers modus operandi.


Again First thing to note is Tabqat is not authentic source, leave a side authenticity for a moment let me refute Ali Sina/Abul Kasem from their own words, Here we can see double standards of Ali Sina/Abul Kasem, Actually They want to twist the things, when Abul Kasem himself said “Muslim historian claim that Muhammad the Qatfan were planning to attack Muslims”. He himself is taking references from these historians and he himself is rejecting what actually they quoted?? This is what we say double standards, Taking things out of context or we can say Taking Half things and leaving Half Things??.

The truth is already quoted before from Al Raheeq Al Makhtoom where it says “Meanwhile it was reported to him that Bani Muharib and Banu Tha’lbah of the Ghatfan tribe were gathering army in order to encounter the Muslims.”

and Allah says
Allah does not forbid you respecting those who have not made war against you on account of (your) religion, and have not driven you forth from your homes, that you show them kindness and deal with them justly; surely Allah loves the doers of justice. [Quran 60:8]



He said
Social Drawback: The answer for the Question that why Muslims are terrorist is simple that Muslims idealise Mohammad.


Yes Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is Ideal, and fighting to save other Muslims and even Non Muslims from bad people will never make you a terrorist.

In the end I repeat the Challenge of Brother Jalal Show us single Ayah of Qur’an and Authentic saying of Prophet peace be upon him, where it says Kill the civillians (of kafirs or Muslims) see the whole debate of Brother Jalal VS Craig Winn on a Radio Show.

Craig Winn is owner of

listen the debate here

also see: